Search
Compare

Intel i9-10900K 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor Intel i3-3225 2-core 3.3 GHz Socket 1155 55W Desktop Processor

5.1/10 Score 3720
Intel i9-10900K 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
1.8/10 Score 1303
Intel i3-3225 2-core 3.3 GHz Socket 1155 55W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 760
$ 290
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

22 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

10

2

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

20

4

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
11% higher

3.7 GHz

3.3 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
100% higher

5.3 GHz

0 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

20 MB

3 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

Yes

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

No

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
44% faster

45.8 GB/s

25.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

32 GB

Generation

10

3

Socket

1200

1155

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

125 Watts

56% lower

55 Watts

Recommended
5.1/10 Score 3720
Intel i9-10900K 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-10900K 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 8
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% bigger
Cores 10 vs 2 (8) 80% more physical cores
Threads 20 vs 4 (16) 80% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz Clock speed is (0.4GHz) 11% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5.3 GHz vs 0 GHz Turbo clock speed is (5.3GHz) 100% higher
Cache 20 MB vs 3 MB (17MB) 85% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 45.8 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (20.2GB/s) 44% faster
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 32 GB Maximium memory is (96GB) 75% more
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 125 Watts vs 55 Watts Power consumption is (70Watts) 56% higher
2nd Choice
1.8/10 Score 1303
Intel i3-3225 2-core 3.3 GHz Socket 1155 55W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i3-3225 2-core 3.3 GHz Socket 1155 55W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i5-3470T Intel i5-3470T
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i7-11700F Intel i7-11700F
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i5-8600T Intel i5-8600T
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i7-11700T Intel i7-11700T
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i5-11400 Intel i5-11400
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i7-5930K Intel i7-5930K
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i3-3240 Intel i3-3240
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i5-9400T Intel i5-9400T
vs