Search
Compare

Intel i9-10900K 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor

5.1/10 Score 3720
Intel i9-10900K 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
5.3/10 Score 3889
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 760
$ 299
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

7 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

10

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

20

16

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
3% higher

3.7 GHz

3.6 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
17% higher

5.3 GHz

4.4 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

20 MB

32 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

45.8 GB/s

4% faster

47.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

10

0

Socket

1200

0

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

125 Watts

48% lower

65 Watts

Recommended
5.1/10 Score 3720
Intel i9-10900K 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-10900K 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 4
Cores 10 vs 8 (2) 20% more physical cores
Threads 20 vs 16 (4) 20% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Clock speed is (0.1GHz) 3% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5.3 GHz vs 4.4 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.9GHz) 17% higher
CONS 4
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 7 nm CPU architecture size is (7nm) 50% smaller
Cache 20 MB vs 32 MB (12MB) 38% smaller processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 45.8 GB/s vs 47.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (1.8GB/s) 4% slower
Thermal Design Power 125 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (60Watts) 48% higher
2nd Choice
5.3/10 Score 3889
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i5-10500T Intel i5-10500T
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i3-10100 Intel i3-10100
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i5-4670K Intel i5-4670K
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i5-3330S Intel i5-3330S
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i5-11600K Intel i5-11600K
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i5-4590 Intel i5-4590
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
vs