Search
Compare

Intel i9-10900K 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor AMD Ryzen 3 3200G 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor

5.1/10 Score 3720
Intel i9-10900K 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
3.1/10 Score 2307
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 760
$ 95
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

12 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

10

4

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

20

4

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
3% higher

3.7 GHz

3.6 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
25% higher

5.3 GHz

4 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

20 MB

4 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
5% faster

45.8 GB/s

43.7 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

64 GB

Generation

10

0

Socket

1200

0

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

125 Watts

48% lower

65 Watts

Recommended
5.1/10 Score 3720
Intel i9-10900K 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-10900K 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 7
Cores 10 vs 4 (6) 60% more physical cores
Threads 20 vs 4 (16) 80% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Clock speed is (0.1GHz) 3% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5.3 GHz vs 4 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1.3GHz) 25% higher
Cache 20 MB vs 4 MB (16MB) 80% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 45.8 GB/s vs 43.7 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (2.1GB/s) 5% faster
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% more
CONS 2
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 12 nm CPU architecture size is (2nm) 14% smaller
Thermal Design Power 125 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (60Watts) 48% higher
2nd Choice
3.1/10 Score 2307
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 AMD Ryzen 7 1700
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i7-4790T Intel i7-4790T
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i7-9700F Intel i7-9700F
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i3-4130 Intel i3-4130
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i7-4770T Intel i7-4770T
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i9-8950HK Intel i9-8950HK
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i3-4330 Intel i3-4330
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 AMD Ryzen 5 1400
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i5-8500 Intel i5-8500
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i5-4690K Intel i5-4690K
vs