Search
Compare

Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor Intel i5-8400T 6-core 1.7 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor

5.1/10 Score 3728
Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
4.4/10 Score 3192
Intel i5-8400T 6-core 1.7 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 460
N\A
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

10

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

20

6

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
39% higher

2.8 GHz

1.7 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
37% higher

5.2 GHz

3.3 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

20 MB

9 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
9% faster

45.8 GB/s

41.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

10

8

Socket

1200

1151

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

65 Watts

46% lower

35 Watts

Recommended
5.1/10 Score 3728
Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 6
Cores 10 vs 6 (4) 40% more physical cores
Threads 20 vs 6 (14) 70% more logical cores
CPU Clock 2.8 GHz vs 1.7 GHz Clock speed is (1.1GHz) 39% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1.9GHz) 37% higher
Cache 20 MB vs 9 MB (11MB) 55% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 45.8 GB/s vs 41.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (4.2GB/s) 9% faster
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 65 Watts vs 35 Watts Power consumption is (30Watts) 46% higher
2nd Choice
4.4/10 Score 3192
Intel i5-8400T 6-core 1.7 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-8400T 6-core 1.7 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
AMD Ryzen 1920X AMD Ryzen 1920X
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i5-3340 Intel i5-3340
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i3-4130T Intel i3-4130T
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i7-9700 Intel i7-9700
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i5-4570 Intel i5-4570
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
AMD Ryzen 2950X AMD Ryzen 2950X
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i5-5675C Intel i5-5675C
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i7-10700 Intel i7-10700
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i7-9700 Intel i7-9700
vs