Search
Compare

Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor Intel i3-3240 2-core 3.4 GHz Socket 1155 55W Desktop Processor

5.1/10 Score 3728
Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
1.8/10 Score 1309
Intel i3-3240 2-core 3.4 GHz Socket 1155 55W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 460
$ 130
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

22 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

10

2

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

20

4

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

2.8 GHz

18% higher

3.4 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
100% higher

5.2 GHz

0 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

20 MB

3 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

Yes

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

No

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
44% faster

45.8 GB/s

25.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

32 GB

Generation

10

3

Socket

1200

1155

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

65 Watts

15% lower

55 Watts

Recommended
5.1/10 Score 3728
Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 7
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% bigger
Cores 10 vs 2 (8) 80% more physical cores
Threads 20 vs 4 (16) 80% more logical cores
CPU Turbo Clock 5.2 GHz vs 0 GHz Turbo clock speed is (5.2GHz) 100% higher
Cache 20 MB vs 3 MB (17MB) 85% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 45.8 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (20.2GB/s) 44% faster
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 32 GB Maximium memory is (96GB) 75% more
CONS 2
CPU Clock 2.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz Clock speed is (0.6GHz) 18% lower
Thermal Design Power 65 Watts vs 55 Watts Power consumption is (10Watts) 15% higher
2nd Choice
1.8/10 Score 1309
Intel i3-3240 2-core 3.4 GHz Socket 1155 55W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i3-3240 2-core 3.4 GHz Socket 1155 55W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i3-7300 Intel i3-7300
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i5-3550 Intel i5-3550
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i5-9400F Intel i5-9400F
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i5-4670S Intel i5-4670S
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i7-9700T Intel i7-9700T
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i3-3210 Intel i3-3210
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i3-7101E Intel i3-7101E
vs