Search
Compare

Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-core 3.8 GHz Socket 0 105W Desktop Processor

5.1/10 Score 3728
Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
6.2/10 Score 4554
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-core 3.8 GHz Socket 0 105W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 460
$ 449
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

7 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

10

12

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

20

24

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

2.8 GHz

26% higher

3.8 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
12% higher

5.2 GHz

4.6 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

20 MB

64 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

45.8 GB/s

4% faster

47.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

10

0

Socket

1200

0

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
38% lower

65 Watts

105 Watts

Recommended
6.2/10 Score 4554
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-core 3.8 GHz Socket 0 105W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-core 3.8 GHz Socket 0 105W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 6
CPU Architecture 7 nm vs 14 nm CPU architecture size is (7nm) 50% bigger
Cores 12 vs 10 (2) 17% more physical cores
Threads 24 vs 20 (4) 17% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz Clock speed is (1GHz) 26% higher
Cache 64 MB vs 20 MB (44MB) 69% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 47.6 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (1.8GB/s) 4% faster
CONS 2
CPU Turbo Clock 4.6 GHz vs 5.2 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.6GHz) 12% lower
Thermal Design Power 105 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (40Watts) 38% higher
2nd Choice
5.1/10 Score 3728
Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i3-4150 Intel i3-4150
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X AMD Ryzen 3 2300X
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i5-6500 Intel i5-6500
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i3-3250 Intel i3-3250
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
AMD Ryzen 3960X AMD Ryzen 3960X
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i5-3570K Intel i5-3570K
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i5-10500 Intel i5-10500
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i5-9400F Intel i5-9400F
vs