Search
Compare

Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor AMD Ryzen 1900X 8-core 3.8 GHz Socket 0 180W Desktop Processor

5.1/10 Score 3728
Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
5.4/10 Score 3945
AMD Ryzen 1900X 8-core 3.8 GHz Socket 0 180W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 460
$ 185
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

10

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

20

16

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

2.8 GHz

26% higher

3.8 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
23% higher

5.2 GHz

4 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

20 MB

16 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

45.8 GB/s

42% faster

79.4 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

2048 GB

Generation

10

0

Socket

1200

0

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
64% lower

65 Watts

180 Watts

Recommended
5.1/10 Score 3728
Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 5
Cores 10 vs 8 (2) 20% more physical cores
Threads 20 vs 16 (4) 20% more logical cores
CPU Turbo Clock 5.2 GHz vs 4 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1.2GHz) 23% higher
Cache 20 MB vs 16 MB (4MB) 20% bigger processor cache memory
Thermal Design Power 65 Watts vs 180 Watts Power consumption is (115Watts) 64% lower
CONS 3
CPU Clock 2.8 GHz vs 3.8 GHz Clock speed is (1GHz) 26% lower
Memory Bandwidth 45.8 GB/s vs 79.4 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (33.6GB/s) 42% slower
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 2048 GB Maximium memory is (1920GB) 94% less
2nd Choice
5.4/10 Score 3945
AMD Ryzen 1900X 8-core 3.8 GHz Socket 0 180W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 1900X 8-core 3.8 GHz Socket 0 180W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i3-4170 Intel i3-4170
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i7-9700KF Intel i7-9700KF
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i7-8700 Intel i7-8700
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i5-10400 Intel i5-10400
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i3-7100T Intel i3-7100T
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i5-8500T Intel i5-8500T
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i5-4690T Intel i5-4690T
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i5-4590T Intel i5-4590T
vs