Search
Compare

Intel i7-9700K 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor Intel i5-5675C 4-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1150 65W Desktop Processor

4.6/10 Score 3389
Intel i7-9700K 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
2/10 Score 1434
Intel i5-5675C 4-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1150 65W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 380
$ 290
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

4

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

8

4

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
14% higher

3.6 GHz

3.1 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
27% higher

4.9 GHz

3.6 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

12 MB

4 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

Yes

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

No

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
38% faster

41.6 GB/s

25.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

32 GB

Generation

9

5

Socket

1151

1150

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

95 Watts

32% lower

65 Watts

Recommended
4.6/10 Score 3389
Intel i7-9700K 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-9700K 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 7
Cores 8 vs 4 (4) 50% more physical cores
Threads 8 vs 4 (4) 50% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz Clock speed is (0.5GHz) 14% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 4.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1.3GHz) 27% higher
Cache 12 MB vs 4 MB (8MB) 67% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (16GB/s) 38% faster
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 32 GB Maximium memory is (96GB) 75% more
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 95 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (30Watts) 32% higher
2nd Choice
2/10 Score 1434
Intel i5-5675C 4-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1150 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-5675C 4-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1150 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i7-9700K Intel i7-9700K
Intel i3-10100T Intel i3-10100T
vs
Intel i7-9700K Intel i7-9700K
Intel i9-11900T Intel i9-11900T
vs
Intel i7-9700K Intel i7-9700K
Intel i5-9600K Intel i5-9600K
vs
Intel i7-9700K Intel i7-9700K
Intel i3-7350K Intel i3-7350K
vs
Intel i7-9700K Intel i7-9700K
Intel i3-6300 Intel i3-6300
vs
Intel i7-9700K Intel i7-9700K
Intel i7-10700 Intel i7-10700
vs
Intel i7-9700K Intel i7-9700K
Intel i5-5675C Intel i5-5675C
vs
Intel i7-9700K Intel i7-9700K
Intel i5-4460 Intel i5-4460
vs
Intel i7-9700K Intel i7-9700K
Intel i5-11500 Intel i5-11500
vs
Intel i7-9700K Intel i7-9700K
Intel i5-4690T Intel i5-4690T
vs