Search
Compare

Intel i7-9700F 8-core 3 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor Intel i9-9900KF 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor

4.6/10 Score 3382
Intel i7-9700F 8-core 3 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
4.8/10 Score 3531
Intel i9-9900KF 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 327
$ 502
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

8

16

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3 GHz

17% higher

3.6 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

4.7 GHz

6% higher

5 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

12 MB

16 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

41.6 GB/s

41.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

9

9

Socket

1151

1151

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
32% lower

65 Watts

95 Watts

Recommended
4.8/10 Score 3531
Intel i9-9900KF 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-9900KF 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 4
Threads 16 vs 8 (8) 50% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz Clock speed is (0.6GHz) 17% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5 GHz vs 4.7 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.3GHz) 6% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 12 MB (4MB) 25% bigger processor cache memory
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 95 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (30Watts) 32% higher
2nd Choice
4.6/10 Score 3382
Intel i7-9700F 8-core 3 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-9700F 8-core 3 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i3-4130 Intel i3-4130
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i5-11400T Intel i5-11400T
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i7-6850K Intel i7-6850K
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i5-10600T Intel i5-10600T
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i3-9300 Intel i3-9300
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i7-4770T Intel i7-4770T
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i5-3450 Intel i5-3450
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i5-11600 Intel i5-11600
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i3-7101E Intel i3-7101E
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs