Search
Compare

Intel i7-9700F 8-core 3 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor Intel i9-10900T 10-core 1.9 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor

4.6/10 Score 3382
Intel i7-9700F 8-core 3 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
5/10 Score 3694
Intel i9-10900T 10-core 1.9 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 327
N\A
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

10

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

8

20

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
37% higher

3 GHz

1.9 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
2% higher

4.7 GHz

4.6 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

12 MB

20 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

41.6 GB/s

9% faster

45.8 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

9

10

Socket

1151

1200

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

65 Watts

46% lower

35 Watts

Recommended
5/10 Score 3694
Intel i9-10900T 10-core 1.9 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-10900T 10-core 1.9 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 5
Cores 10 vs 8 (2) 20% more physical cores
Threads 20 vs 8 (12) 60% more logical cores
Cache 20 MB vs 12 MB (8MB) 40% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 45.8 GB/s vs 41.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (4.2GB/s) 9% faster
Thermal Design Power 35 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (30Watts) 46% lower
CONS 2
CPU Clock 1.9 GHz vs 3 GHz Clock speed is (1.1GHz) 37% lower
CPU Turbo Clock 4.6 GHz vs 4.7 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.1GHz) 2% lower
2nd Choice
4.6/10 Score 3382
Intel i7-9700F 8-core 3 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-9700F 8-core 3 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i3-10320 Intel i3-10320
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i7-8700 Intel i7-8700
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i3-3210 Intel i3-3210
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i5-9500F Intel i5-9500F
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i7-4790K Intel i7-4790K
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i3-4160 Intel i3-4160
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i3-7300T Intel i3-7300T
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i7-9700KF Intel i7-9700KF
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 AMD Ryzen 7 2700
vs