Search
Compare

Intel i7-9700F 8-core 3 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor

4.6/10 Score 3382
Intel i7-9700F 8-core 3 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 327
$ 440
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

22 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

8

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3 GHz

9% higher

3.3 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
23% higher

4.7 GHz

3.6 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

12 MB

15 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

41.6 GB/s

39% faster

68 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

64 GB

Generation

9

5

Socket

1151

2011

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
54% lower

65 Watts

140 Watts

Recommended
4.6/10 Score 3382
Intel i7-9700F 8-core 3 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-9700F 8-core 3 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 5
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% bigger
Cores 8 vs 6 (2) 25% more physical cores
CPU Turbo Clock 4.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1.1GHz) 23% higher
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% more
Thermal Design Power 65 Watts vs 140 Watts Power consumption is (75Watts) 54% lower
CONS 4
Threads 8 vs 12 (4) 33% less logical cores
CPU Clock 3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz Clock speed is (0.3GHz) 9% lower
Cache 12 MB vs 15 MB (3MB) 20% smaller processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s vs 68 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (26.4GB/s) 39% slower
2nd Choice
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i7-9700F Intel i7-9700F
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
Intel i7-9700F Intel i7-9700F
Intel i9-8950HK Intel i9-8950HK
vs
Intel i7-9700F Intel i7-9700F
Intel i5-8400T Intel i5-8400T
vs
Intel i7-9700F Intel i7-9700F
Intel i5-8600 Intel i5-8600
vs
Intel i7-9700F Intel i7-9700F
Intel i3-9320 Intel i3-9320
vs
Intel i7-9700F Intel i7-9700F
Intel i7-9700F Intel i7-9700F
vs
Intel i7-9700F Intel i7-9700F
Intel i5-6402P Intel i5-6402P
vs
Intel i7-9700F Intel i7-9700F
Intel i7-3770K Intel i7-3770K
vs
Intel i7-9700F Intel i7-9700F
Intel i7-4785T Intel i7-4785T
vs
Intel i7-9700F Intel i7-9700F
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
vs