Search
Compare

Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor Intel i5-8400T 6-core 1.7 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor

5.2/10 Score 3813
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
4.4/10 Score 3192
Intel i5-8400T 6-core 1.7 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 1000
N\A
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

6

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
47% higher

3.2 GHz

1.7 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
11% higher

3.7 GHz

3.3 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

20 MB

9 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
46% faster

76.8 GB/s

41.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

6

8

Socket

2011

1151

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

140 Watts

75% lower

35 Watts

Recommended
5.2/10 Score 3813
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 6
Cores 8 vs 6 (2) 25% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 6 (10) 63% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.2 GHz vs 1.7 GHz Clock speed is (1.5GHz) 47% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 3.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.4GHz) 11% higher
Cache 20 MB vs 9 MB (11MB) 55% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 76.8 GB/s vs 41.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (35.2GB/s) 46% faster
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 140 Watts vs 35 Watts Power consumption is (105Watts) 75% higher
2nd Choice
4.4/10 Score 3192
Intel i5-8400T 6-core 1.7 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-8400T 6-core 1.7 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i5-4690K Intel i5-4690K
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i7-9700T Intel i7-9700T
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i3-3245 Intel i3-3245
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i9-10940X Intel i9-10940X
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i5-8500 Intel i5-8500
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i3-9300T Intel i3-9300T
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i3-6300 Intel i3-6300
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i5-10400T Intel i5-10400T
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i3-10300T Intel i3-10300T
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i5-4590S Intel i5-4590S
vs