Search
Compare

Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor

5.2/10 Score 3813
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
3.6/10 Score 2610
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 1000
$ 119
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

12 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.2 GHz

6% higher

3.4 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

3.7 GHz

5% higher

3.9 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

20 MB

16 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
43% faster

76.8 GB/s

43.7 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

64 GB

Generation

6

0

Socket

2011

0

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

140 Watts

54% lower

65 Watts

Recommended
5.2/10 Score 3813
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 5
Cores 8 vs 6 (2) 25% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 12 (4) 25% more logical cores
Cache 20 MB vs 16 MB (4MB) 20% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 76.8 GB/s vs 43.7 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (33.1GB/s) 43% faster
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% more
CONS 4
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 12 nm CPU architecture size is (2nm) 14% smaller
CPU Clock 3.2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz Clock speed is (0.2GHz) 6% lower
CPU Turbo Clock 3.7 GHz vs 3.9 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.2GHz) 5% lower
Thermal Design Power 140 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (75Watts) 54% higher
2nd Choice
3.6/10 Score 2610
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i5-9500 Intel i5-9500
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
AMD Ryzen 1950X AMD Ryzen 1950X
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i7-6700K Intel i7-6700K
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i5-8500 Intel i5-8500
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i5-6400T Intel i5-6400T
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i5-6500 Intel i5-6500
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i3-3240 Intel i3-3240
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i5-4670K Intel i5-4670K
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i7-4770T Intel i7-4770T
vs