Search
Compare

Intel i7-5930K 6-core 3.5 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor

3.7/10 Score 2687
Intel i7-5930K 6-core 3.5 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
3.6/10 Score 2610
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 620
$ 119
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

22 nm

12 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

12

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
3% higher

3.5 GHz

3.4 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

3.7 GHz

5% higher

3.9 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

15 MB

16 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
36% faster

68 GB/s

43.7 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

64 GB

64 GB

Generation

5

0

Socket

2011

0

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

140 Watts

54% lower

65 Watts

Recommended
3.7/10 Score 2687
Intel i7-5930K 6-core 3.5 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-5930K 6-core 3.5 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 2
CPU Clock 3.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz Clock speed is (0.1GHz) 3% higher
Memory Bandwidth 68 GB/s vs 43.7 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (24.3GB/s) 36% faster
CONS 4
CPU Architecture 22 nm vs 12 nm CPU architecture size is (10nm) 45% smaller
CPU Turbo Clock 3.7 GHz vs 3.9 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.2GHz) 5% lower
Cache 15 MB vs 16 MB (1MB) 6% smaller processor cache memory
Thermal Design Power 140 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (75Watts) 54% higher
2nd Choice
3.6/10 Score 2610
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i7-5930K Intel i7-5930K
Intel i7-3770S Intel i7-3770S
vs
Intel i7-5930K Intel i7-5930K
Intel i5-11400 Intel i5-11400
vs
Intel i7-5930K Intel i7-5930K
Intel i5-10600K Intel i5-10600K
vs
Intel i7-5930K Intel i7-5930K
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X AMD Ryzen 5 1500X
vs
Intel i7-5930K Intel i7-5930K
Intel i5-4570 Intel i5-4570
vs
Intel i7-5930K Intel i7-5930K
Intel i5-10600K Intel i5-10600K
vs
Intel i7-5930K Intel i7-5930K
Intel i3-3250 Intel i3-3250
vs
Intel i7-5930K Intel i7-5930K
Intel i5-10600 Intel i5-10600
vs
Intel i7-5930K Intel i7-5930K
Intel i3-8100 Intel i3-8100
vs
Intel i7-5930K Intel i7-5930K
Intel i5-4690T Intel i5-4690T
vs