Search
Compare

Intel i7-5930K 6-core 3.5 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor AMD Ryzen 3 2200G 4-core 3.5 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor

3.7/10 Score 2687
Intel i7-5930K 6-core 3.5 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
3.1/10 Score 2294
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G 4-core 3.5 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 620
$ 105
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

22 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

4

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

12

4

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.5 GHz

3.5 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

3.7 GHz

3.7 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

15 MB

4 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
36% faster

68 GB/s

43.7 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

64 GB

64 GB

Generation

5

0

Socket

2011

0

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

140 Watts

54% lower

65 Watts

Recommended
3.7/10 Score 2687
Intel i7-5930K 6-core 3.5 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-5930K 6-core 3.5 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 4
Cores 6 vs 4 (2) 33% more physical cores
Threads 12 vs 4 (8) 67% more logical cores
Cache 15 MB vs 4 MB (11MB) 73% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 68 GB/s vs 43.7 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (24.3GB/s) 36% faster
CONS 2
CPU Architecture 22 nm vs 14 nm CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% smaller
Thermal Design Power 140 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (75Watts) 54% higher
2nd Choice
3.1/10 Score 2294
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G 4-core 3.5 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G 4-core 3.5 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i7-5930K Intel i7-5930K
Intel i3-10320 Intel i3-10320
vs
Intel i7-5930K Intel i7-5930K
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
vs
Intel i7-5930K Intel i7-5930K
Intel i5-4570T Intel i5-4570T
vs
Intel i7-5930K Intel i7-5930K
Intel i5-10600 Intel i5-10600
vs
Intel i7-5930K Intel i7-5930K
Intel i3-4130T Intel i3-4130T
vs
Intel i7-5930K Intel i7-5930K
Intel i5-4460 Intel i5-4460
vs
Intel i7-5930K Intel i7-5930K
Intel i5-3330 Intel i5-3330
vs
Intel i7-5930K Intel i7-5930K
Intel i5-8500 Intel i5-8500
vs
Intel i7-5930K Intel i7-5930K
Intel i7-6700T Intel i7-6700T
vs
Intel i7-5930K Intel i7-5930K
Intel i3-10300T Intel i3-10300T
vs