Search
Compare

Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor Intel i9-11900F 8-core 2.5 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor

3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
4.9/10 Score 3620
Intel i9-11900F 8-core 2.5 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 440
N\A
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

22 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

12

16

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
24% higher

3.3 GHz

2.5 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

3.6 GHz

31% higher

5.2 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

15 MB

16 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
26% faster

68 GB/s

50 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

64 GB

128 GB

Generation

5

11

Socket

2011

1200

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

140 Watts

54% lower

65 Watts

Recommended
4.9/10 Score 3620
Intel i9-11900F 8-core 2.5 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-11900F 8-core 2.5 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 7
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% bigger
Cores 8 vs 6 (2) 25% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 12 (4) 25% more logical cores
CPU Turbo Clock 5.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1.6GHz) 31% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 15 MB (1MB) 6% bigger processor cache memory
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% more
Thermal Design Power 65 Watts vs 140 Watts Power consumption is (75Watts) 54% lower
CONS 2
CPU Clock 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz Clock speed is (0.8GHz) 24% lower
Memory Bandwidth 50 GB/s vs 68 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (18GB/s) 26% slower
2nd Choice
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
Intel i3-4170 Intel i3-4170
vs
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
Intel i3-3225 Intel i3-3225
vs
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
Intel i3-3220T Intel i3-3220T
vs
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
Intel i5-4570 Intel i5-4570
vs
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X AMD Ryzen 5 1500X
vs
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
Intel i5-10600K Intel i5-10600K
vs
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
Intel i5-4430 Intel i5-4430
vs
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
Intel i3-4370 Intel i3-4370
vs
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
Intel i5-7500T Intel i5-7500T
vs
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
vs