Search
Compare

Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor Intel i9-10900K 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor

3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
5.1/10 Score 3720
Intel i9-10900K 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 440
$ 760
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

22 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

10

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

12

20

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.3 GHz

11% higher

3.7 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

3.6 GHz

32% higher

5.3 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

15 MB

20 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
33% faster

68 GB/s

45.8 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

64 GB

128 GB

Generation

5

10

Socket

2011

1200

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

140 Watts

11% lower

125 Watts

Recommended
5.1/10 Score 3720
Intel i9-10900K 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-10900K 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 8
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% bigger
Cores 10 vs 6 (4) 40% more physical cores
Threads 20 vs 12 (8) 40% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz Clock speed is (0.4GHz) 11% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1.7GHz) 32% higher
Cache 20 MB vs 15 MB (5MB) 25% bigger processor cache memory
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% more
Thermal Design Power 125 Watts vs 140 Watts Power consumption is (15Watts) 11% lower
CONS 1
Memory Bandwidth 45.8 GB/s vs 68 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (22.2GB/s) 33% slower
2nd Choice
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i5-4690S Intel i5-4690S
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i3-7100T Intel i3-7100T
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i3-9100 Intel i3-9100
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i5-11400T Intel i5-11400T
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i5-10500T Intel i5-10500T
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i3-4130T Intel i3-4130T
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
AMD Ryzen 2920X AMD Ryzen 2920X
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i5-3450 Intel i5-3450
vs