Search
Compare

Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor Intel i5-8600K 6-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor

3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
4.4/10 Score 3261
Intel i5-8600K 6-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 440
$ 254
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

22 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

12

6

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.3 GHz

8% higher

3.6 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

3.6 GHz

16% higher

4.3 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

15 MB

9 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
39% faster

68 GB/s

41.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

64 GB

128 GB

Generation

5

8

Socket

2011

1151

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

140 Watts

32% lower

95 Watts

Recommended
4.4/10 Score 3261
Intel i5-8600K 6-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-8600K 6-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 5
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% bigger
CPU Clock 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz Clock speed is (0.3GHz) 8% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 4.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.7GHz) 16% higher
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% more
Thermal Design Power 95 Watts vs 140 Watts Power consumption is (45Watts) 32% lower
CONS 3
Threads 6 vs 12 (6) 50% less logical cores
Cache 9 MB vs 15 MB (6MB) 40% smaller processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s vs 68 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (26.4GB/s) 39% slower
2nd Choice
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i5-8600K Intel i5-8600K
Intel i5-10600T Intel i5-10600T
vs
Intel i5-8600K Intel i5-8600K
Intel i5-3550 Intel i5-3550
vs
Intel i5-8600K Intel i5-8600K
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
Intel i5-8600K Intel i5-8600K
Intel i5-4570 Intel i5-4570
vs
Intel i5-8600K Intel i5-8600K
Intel i7-9700K Intel i7-9700K
vs
Intel i5-8600K Intel i5-8600K
Intel i3-4130T Intel i3-4130T
vs
Intel i5-8600K Intel i5-8600K
Intel i3-9350K Intel i3-9350K
vs
Intel i5-8600K Intel i5-8600K
Intel i3-4160 Intel i3-4160
vs
Intel i5-8600K Intel i5-8600K
Intel i5-6600 Intel i5-6600
vs
Intel i5-8600K Intel i5-8600K
Intel i7-6950X Intel i7-6950X
vs