Search
Compare

Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3800X 8-core 3.9 GHz Socket 0 105W Desktop Processor

3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
5.3/10 Score 3868
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X 8-core 3.9 GHz Socket 0 105W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 440
$ 339
Share with friends
Copy link
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

22 nm

7 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

12

16

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.3 GHz

15% higher

3.9 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

3.6 GHz

20% higher

4.5 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

15 MB

32 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
30% faster

68 GB/s

47.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

64 GB

128 GB

Generation

5

0

Socket

2011

0

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

140 Watts

25% lower

105 Watts

Recommended
5.3/10 Score 3868
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X 8-core 3.9 GHz Socket 0 105W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X 8-core 3.9 GHz Socket 0 105W Desktop Processor
Compatible
PROS 8
CPU Architecture 7 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (15nm) 68% bigger
Cores 8 vs 6 (2) 25% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 12 (4) 25% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.9 GHz vs 3.3 GHz Clock speed is (0.6GHz) 15% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 4.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.9GHz) 20% higher
Cache 32 MB vs 15 MB (17MB) 53% bigger processor cache memory
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% more
Thermal Design Power 105 Watts vs 140 Watts Power consumption is (35Watts) 25% lower
CONS 1
Memory Bandwidth 47.6 GB/s vs 68 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (20.4GB/s) 30% slower
2nd Choice
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Compatible
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side