Search
Compare

Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600X 6-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 95W Desktop Processor

3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
3.5/10 Score 2599
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X 6-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 95W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 440
$ 170
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

22 nm

12 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

12

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.3 GHz

8% higher

3.6 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

3.6 GHz

14% higher

4.2 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

15 MB

16 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
36% faster

68 GB/s

43.7 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

64 GB

64 GB

Generation

5

0

Socket

2011

0

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

140 Watts

32% lower

95 Watts

Recommended
3.5/10 Score 2599
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X 6-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 95W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X 6-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 95W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 5
CPU Architecture 12 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (10nm) 45% bigger
CPU Clock 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz Clock speed is (0.3GHz) 8% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 4.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.6GHz) 14% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 15 MB (1MB) 6% bigger processor cache memory
Thermal Design Power 95 Watts vs 140 Watts Power consumption is (45Watts) 32% lower
CONS 1
Memory Bandwidth 43.7 GB/s vs 68 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (24.3GB/s) 36% slower
2nd Choice
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
Intel i3-10320 Intel i3-10320
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
Intel i5-6500 Intel i5-6500
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
Intel i5-4670T Intel i5-4670T
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
Intel i3-4130T Intel i3-4130T
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
Intel i5-4690S Intel i5-4690S
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
Intel i7-7700T Intel i7-7700T
vs