Search
Compare

Intel i7-3770S 4-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1155 65W Desktop Processor Intel i9-9900K 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor

2.1/10 Score 1529
Intel i7-3770S 4-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1155 65W Desktop Processor
4.8/10 Score 3531
Intel i9-9900K 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 320
$ 544
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

22 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

4

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

8

16

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.1 GHz

14% higher

3.6 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

3.3 GHz

34% higher

5 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

8 MB

16 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

No

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

25.6 GB/s

38% faster

41.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

32 GB

128 GB

Generation

3

9

Socket

1155

1151

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
32% lower

65 Watts

95 Watts

Recommended
4.8/10 Score 3531
Intel i9-9900K 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-9900K 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 8
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% bigger
Cores 8 vs 4 (4) 50% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 8 (8) 50% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz Clock speed is (0.5GHz) 14% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1.7GHz) 34% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 8 MB (8MB) 50% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (16GB/s) 38% faster
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 32 GB Maximium memory is (96GB) 75% more
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 95 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (30Watts) 32% higher
2nd Choice
2.1/10 Score 1529
Intel i7-3770S 4-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1155 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-3770S 4-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1155 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
vs
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
Intel i3-4330T Intel i3-4330T
vs
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
vs
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
Intel i7-6700T Intel i7-6700T
vs
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
Intel i7-8700T Intel i7-8700T
vs
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
Intel i5-4460 Intel i5-4460
vs
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
vs
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
vs
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
AMD Ryzen 1920X AMD Ryzen 1920X
vs