Search
Compare

Intel i7-11700KF 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor Intel i5-8600 6-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor

4.9/10 Score 3615
Intel i7-11700KF 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
4.5/10 Score 3263
Intel i5-8600 6-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
$ 260
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

6

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
14% higher

3.6 GHz

3.1 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
14% higher

5 GHz

4.3 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

16 MB

9 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
17% faster

50 GB/s

41.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

11

8

Socket

1200

1151

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

125 Watts

48% lower

65 Watts

Recommended
4.9/10 Score 3615
Intel i7-11700KF 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-11700KF 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 6
Cores 8 vs 6 (2) 25% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 6 (10) 63% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz Clock speed is (0.5GHz) 14% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.7GHz) 14% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 9 MB (7MB) 44% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 50 GB/s vs 41.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (8.4GB/s) 17% faster
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 125 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (60Watts) 48% higher
2nd Choice
4.5/10 Score 3263
Intel i5-8600 6-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-8600 6-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i7-11700KF Intel i7-11700KF
Intel i3-10100 Intel i3-10100
vs
Intel i7-11700KF Intel i7-11700KF
Intel i3-9300T Intel i3-9300T
vs
Intel i7-11700KF Intel i7-11700KF
Intel i7-5930K Intel i7-5930K
vs
Intel i7-11700KF Intel i7-11700KF
Intel i5-6400 Intel i5-6400
vs
Intel i7-11700KF Intel i7-11700KF
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
vs
Intel i7-11700KF Intel i7-11700KF
Intel i3-4170 Intel i3-4170
vs
Intel i7-11700KF Intel i7-11700KF
Intel i5-11600 Intel i5-11600
vs
Intel i7-11700KF Intel i7-11700KF
Intel i5-8500T Intel i5-8500T
vs
Intel i7-11700KF Intel i7-11700KF
Intel i5-4440S Intel i5-4440S
vs
Intel i7-11700KF Intel i7-11700KF
Intel i5-6400T Intel i5-6400T
vs