Search
Compare

Intel i7-11700F 8-core 2.5 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor Intel i3-4150 2-core 3.5 GHz Socket 1150 54W Desktop Processor

4.9/10 Score 3613
Intel i7-11700F 8-core 2.5 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
1.9/10 Score 1404
Intel i3-4150 2-core 3.5 GHz Socket 1150 54W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
$ 120
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

22 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

2

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

4

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

2.5 GHz

29% higher

3.5 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
27% higher

4.9 GHz

3.6 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

16 MB

3 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

Yes

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

No

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
49% faster

50 GB/s

25.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

32 GB

Generation

11

4

Socket

1200

1150

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

65 Watts

17% lower

54 Watts

Recommended
4.9/10 Score 3613
Intel i7-11700F 8-core 2.5 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-11700F 8-core 2.5 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 7
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% bigger
Cores 8 vs 2 (6) 75% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 4 (12) 75% more logical cores
CPU Turbo Clock 4.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1.3GHz) 27% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 3 MB (13MB) 81% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 50 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (24.4GB/s) 49% faster
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 32 GB Maximium memory is (96GB) 75% more
CONS 2
CPU Clock 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz Clock speed is (1GHz) 29% lower
Thermal Design Power 65 Watts vs 54 Watts Power consumption is (11Watts) 17% higher
2nd Choice
1.9/10 Score 1404
Intel i3-4150 2-core 3.5 GHz Socket 1150 54W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i3-4150 2-core 3.5 GHz Socket 1150 54W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i7-11700F Intel i7-11700F
Intel i7-9700KF Intel i7-9700KF
vs
Intel i7-11700F Intel i7-11700F
Intel i3-7101TE Intel i3-7101TE
vs
Intel i7-11700F Intel i7-11700F
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
vs
Intel i7-11700F Intel i7-11700F
Intel i7-6700 Intel i7-6700
vs
Intel i7-11700F Intel i7-11700F
Intel i5-3570S Intel i5-3570S
vs
Intel i7-11700F Intel i7-11700F
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 AMD Ryzen 7 1700
vs
Intel i7-11700F Intel i7-11700F
Intel i5-10500T Intel i5-10500T
vs
Intel i7-11700F Intel i7-11700F
Intel i5-10400T Intel i5-10400T
vs
Intel i7-11700F Intel i7-11700F
AMD Ryzen 2950X AMD Ryzen 2950X
vs
Intel i7-11700F Intel i7-11700F
Intel i7-8086K Intel i7-8086K
vs