Search
Compare

Intel i7-10700T 8-core 2 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor Intel i7-5930K 6-core 3.5 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor

4.8/10 Score 3492
Intel i7-10700T 8-core 2 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
3.7/10 Score 2687
Intel i7-5930K 6-core 3.5 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
$ 620
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

22 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

2 GHz

43% higher

3.5 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
18% higher

4.5 GHz

3.7 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

16 MB

15 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

45.8 GB/s

33% faster

68 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

64 GB

Generation

10

5

Socket

1200

2011

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
75% lower

35 Watts

140 Watts

Recommended
4.8/10 Score 3492
Intel i7-10700T 8-core 2 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-10700T 8-core 2 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 7
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% bigger
Cores 8 vs 6 (2) 25% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 12 (4) 25% more logical cores
CPU Turbo Clock 4.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.8GHz) 18% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 15 MB (1MB) 6% bigger processor cache memory
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% more
Thermal Design Power 35 Watts vs 140 Watts Power consumption is (105Watts) 75% lower
CONS 2
CPU Clock 2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz Clock speed is (1.5GHz) 43% lower
Memory Bandwidth 45.8 GB/s vs 68 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (22.2GB/s) 33% slower
2nd Choice
3.7/10 Score 2687
Intel i7-5930K 6-core 3.5 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-5930K 6-core 3.5 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i7-10700T Intel i7-10700T
Intel i5-9500F Intel i5-9500F
vs
Intel i7-10700T Intel i7-10700T
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
vs
Intel i7-10700T Intel i7-10700T
Intel i5-4570 Intel i5-4570
vs
Intel i7-10700T Intel i7-10700T
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
vs
Intel i7-10700T Intel i7-10700T
Intel i3-9320 Intel i3-9320
vs
Intel i7-10700T Intel i7-10700T
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
vs
Intel i7-10700T Intel i7-10700T
Intel i7-4771 Intel i7-4771
vs
Intel i7-10700T Intel i7-10700T
Intel i5-4460 Intel i5-4460
vs
Intel i7-10700T Intel i7-10700T
Intel i3-8350K Intel i3-8350K
vs
Intel i7-10700T Intel i7-10700T
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs