Search
Compare

Intel i7-10700K 8-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor Intel i3-10320 4-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor

4.9/10 Score 3571
Intel i7-10700K 8-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
4.5/10 Score 3264
Intel i3-10320 4-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 400
$ 190
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

4

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

8

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.8 GHz

3.8 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
10% higher

5.1 GHz

4.6 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

16 MB

8 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
9% faster

45.8 GB/s

41.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

10

10

Socket

1200

1200

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

125 Watts

48% lower

65 Watts

Recommended
4.9/10 Score 3571
Intel i7-10700K 8-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-10700K 8-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 5
Cores 8 vs 4 (4) 50% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 8 (8) 50% more logical cores
CPU Turbo Clock 5.1 GHz vs 4.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.5GHz) 10% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 8 MB (8MB) 50% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 45.8 GB/s vs 41.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (4.2GB/s) 9% faster
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 125 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (60Watts) 48% higher
2nd Choice
4.5/10 Score 3264
Intel i3-10320 4-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i3-10320 4-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 AMD Ryzen 7 2700
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i3-9300T Intel i3-9300T
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i3-6320 Intel i3-6320
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
AMD Ryzen 1920X AMD Ryzen 1920X
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i5-3570K Intel i5-3570K
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i3-3240 Intel i3-3240
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i3-6098P Intel i3-6098P
vs