Search
Compare

Intel i7-10700K 8-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor

4.9/10 Score 3571
Intel i7-10700K 8-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
5.2/10 Score 3800
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 400
$ 170
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

7 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
5% higher

3.8 GHz

3.6 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
18% higher

5.1 GHz

4.2 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

16 MB

32 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

45.8 GB/s

4% faster

47.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

10

0

Socket

1200

0

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

125 Watts

48% lower

65 Watts

Recommended
4.9/10 Score 3571
Intel i7-10700K 8-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-10700K 8-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 4
Cores 8 vs 6 (2) 25% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 12 (4) 25% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Clock speed is (0.2GHz) 5% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5.1 GHz vs 4.2 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.9GHz) 18% higher
CONS 4
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 7 nm CPU architecture size is (7nm) 50% smaller
Cache 16 MB vs 32 MB (16MB) 50% smaller processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 45.8 GB/s vs 47.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (1.8GB/s) 4% slower
Thermal Design Power 125 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (60Watts) 48% higher
2nd Choice
5.2/10 Score 3800
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i5-6600T Intel i5-6600T
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i3-3245 Intel i3-3245
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i7-6700 Intel i7-6700
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i3-6098P Intel i3-6098P
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i3-7101TE Intel i3-7101TE
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i5-3340 Intel i5-3340
vs