Search
Compare

Intel i7-10700K 8-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor AMD Ryzen 3 3200G 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor

4.9/10 Score 3571
Intel i7-10700K 8-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
3.1/10 Score 2307
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 400
$ 95
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

12 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

4

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

4

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
5% higher

3.8 GHz

3.6 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
22% higher

5.1 GHz

4 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

16 MB

4 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
5% faster

45.8 GB/s

43.7 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

64 GB

Generation

10

0

Socket

1200

0

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

125 Watts

48% lower

65 Watts

Recommended
4.9/10 Score 3571
Intel i7-10700K 8-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-10700K 8-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 7
Cores 8 vs 4 (4) 50% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 4 (12) 75% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Clock speed is (0.2GHz) 5% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5.1 GHz vs 4 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1.1GHz) 22% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 4 MB (12MB) 75% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 45.8 GB/s vs 43.7 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (2.1GB/s) 5% faster
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% more
CONS 2
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 12 nm CPU architecture size is (2nm) 14% smaller
Thermal Design Power 125 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (60Watts) 48% higher
2nd Choice
3.1/10 Score 2307
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 AMD Ryzen 7 1700
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i5-9600K Intel i5-9600K
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i5-4670T Intel i5-4670T
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i5-11600T Intel i5-11600T
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i7-6700T Intel i7-6700T
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i5-9600T Intel i5-9600T
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i5-9600T Intel i5-9600T
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i5-3450S Intel i5-3450S
vs