Search
Compare

Intel i7-10700 8-core 2.9 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor Intel i5-9400T 6-core 1.8 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor

4.9/10 Score 3575
Intel i7-10700 8-core 2.9 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
4.4/10 Score 3200
Intel i5-9400T 6-core 1.8 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 320
N\A
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

6

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
38% higher

2.9 GHz

1.8 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
29% higher

4.8 GHz

3.4 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

16 MB

9 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
9% faster

45.8 GB/s

41.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

10

9

Socket

1200

1151

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

65 Watts

46% lower

35 Watts

Recommended
4.9/10 Score 3575
Intel i7-10700 8-core 2.9 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-10700 8-core 2.9 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 6
Cores 8 vs 6 (2) 25% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 6 (10) 63% more logical cores
CPU Clock 2.9 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Clock speed is (1.1GHz) 38% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 4.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1.4GHz) 29% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 9 MB (7MB) 44% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 45.8 GB/s vs 41.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (4.2GB/s) 9% faster
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 65 Watts vs 35 Watts Power consumption is (30Watts) 46% higher
2nd Choice
4.4/10 Score 3200
Intel i5-9400T 6-core 1.8 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-9400T 6-core 1.8 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i7-10700 Intel i7-10700
Intel i5-4670T Intel i5-4670T
vs
Intel i7-10700 Intel i7-10700
Intel i9-10980XE Intel i9-10980XE
vs
Intel i7-10700 Intel i7-10700
Intel i3-7101E Intel i3-7101E
vs
Intel i7-10700 Intel i7-10700
AMD Ryzen 3970X AMD Ryzen 3970X
vs
Intel i7-10700 Intel i7-10700
Intel i7-4770S Intel i7-4770S
vs
Intel i7-10700 Intel i7-10700
Intel i5-7500T Intel i5-7500T
vs
Intel i7-10700 Intel i7-10700
Intel i7-4771 Intel i7-4771
vs
Intel i7-10700 Intel i7-10700
Intel i3-10100 Intel i3-10100
vs
Intel i7-10700 Intel i7-10700
Intel i5-3470 Intel i5-3470
vs
Intel i7-10700 Intel i7-10700
Intel i5-4590 Intel i5-4590
vs