Search
Compare

Intel i5-8400 6-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor

3.2/10 Score 2382
Intel i5-8400 6-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
5.2/10 Score 3813
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 190
$ 1000
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

6

16

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

2.8 GHz

13% higher

3.2 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
8% higher

4 GHz

3.7 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

9 MB

20 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

41.6 GB/s

46% faster

76.8 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

64 GB

128 GB

Generation

8

6

Socket

1151

2011

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
54% lower

65 Watts

140 Watts

Recommended
5.2/10 Score 3813
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 6
Cores 8 vs 6 (2) 25% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 6 (10) 63% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz Clock speed is (0.4GHz) 13% higher
Cache 20 MB vs 9 MB (11MB) 55% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 76.8 GB/s vs 41.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (35.2GB/s) 46% faster
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% more
CONS 2
CPU Turbo Clock 3.7 GHz vs 4 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.3GHz) 8% lower
Thermal Design Power 140 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (75Watts) 54% higher
2nd Choice
3.2/10 Score 2382
Intel i5-8400 6-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-8400 6-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i5-3450S Intel i5-3450S
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i3-4170 Intel i3-4170
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i3-3210 Intel i3-3210
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i9-10940X Intel i9-10940X
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i5-4430 Intel i5-4430
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i3-3250 Intel i3-3250
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i5-9500 Intel i5-9500
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i7-4770S Intel i7-4770S
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i3-9350KF Intel i3-9350KF
vs