Search
Compare

Intel i5-5675C 4-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1150 65W Desktop Processor Intel i9-9900KF 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor

2/10 Score 1434
Intel i5-5675C 4-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1150 65W Desktop Processor
4.8/10 Score 3531
Intel i9-9900KF 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 290
$ 502
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

4

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

4

16

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.1 GHz

14% higher

3.6 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

3.6 GHz

28% higher

5 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

4 MB

16 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

No

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

25.6 GB/s

38% faster

41.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

32 GB

128 GB

Generation

5

9

Socket

1150

1151

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
32% lower

65 Watts

95 Watts

Recommended
4.8/10 Score 3531
Intel i9-9900KF 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-9900KF 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 7
Cores 8 vs 4 (4) 50% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 4 (12) 75% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz Clock speed is (0.5GHz) 14% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1.4GHz) 28% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 4 MB (12MB) 75% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (16GB/s) 38% faster
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 32 GB Maximium memory is (96GB) 75% more
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 95 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (30Watts) 32% higher
2nd Choice
2/10 Score 1434
Intel i5-5675C 4-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1150 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-5675C 4-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1150 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i7-9700 Intel i7-9700
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i7-4770 Intel i7-4770
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i3-3250 Intel i3-3250
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i7-4785T Intel i7-4785T
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i5-7500 Intel i5-7500
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i3-4160 Intel i3-4160
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i3-9100 Intel i3-9100
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i3-3220T Intel i3-3220T
vs