Search
Compare

Intel i5-11600KF 6-core 3.9 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor Intel i9-9900T 8-core 2.1 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor

4.7/10 Score 3480
Intel i5-11600KF 6-core 3.9 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
4.8/10 Score 3495
Intel i9-9900T 8-core 2.1 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
N\A
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

12

16

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
46% higher

3.9 GHz

2.1 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
10% higher

4.9 GHz

4.4 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

12 MB

16 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
17% faster

50 GB/s

41.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

11

9

Socket

1200

1151

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

125 Watts

72% lower

35 Watts

Recommended
4.7/10 Score 3480
Intel i5-11600KF 6-core 3.9 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-11600KF 6-core 3.9 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 3
CPU Clock 3.9 GHz vs 2.1 GHz Clock speed is (1.8GHz) 46% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 4.9 GHz vs 4.4 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.5GHz) 10% higher
Memory Bandwidth 50 GB/s vs 41.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (8.4GB/s) 17% faster
CONS 4
Cores 6 vs 8 (2) 25% less physical cores
Threads 12 vs 16 (4) 25% less logical cores
Cache 12 MB vs 16 MB (4MB) 25% smaller processor cache memory
Thermal Design Power 125 Watts vs 35 Watts Power consumption is (90Watts) 72% higher
2nd Choice
4.8/10 Score 3495
Intel i9-9900T 8-core 2.1 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-9900T 8-core 2.1 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
Intel i3-10320 Intel i3-10320
vs
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
Intel i5-4590S Intel i5-4590S
vs
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 AMD Ryzen 5 1400
vs
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
vs
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 AMD Ryzen 7 2700
vs
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
Intel i5-7500 Intel i5-7500
vs
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
Intel i5-9600K Intel i5-9600K
vs
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
vs
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
Intel i5-11400T Intel i5-11400T
vs
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
Intel i5-11600 Intel i5-11600
vs