Search
Compare

Intel i5-11600KF 6-core 3.9 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor

4.7/10 Score 3480
Intel i5-11600KF 6-core 3.9 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
5.2/10 Score 3813
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
$ 1000
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

12

16

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
18% higher

3.9 GHz

3.2 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
24% higher

4.9 GHz

3.7 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

12 MB

20 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

50 GB/s

35% faster

76.8 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

11

6

Socket

1200

2011

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
11% lower

125 Watts

140 Watts

Recommended
5.2/10 Score 3813
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 4
Cores 8 vs 6 (2) 25% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 12 (4) 25% more logical cores
Cache 20 MB vs 12 MB (8MB) 40% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 76.8 GB/s vs 50 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (26.8GB/s) 35% faster
CONS 3
CPU Clock 3.2 GHz vs 3.9 GHz Clock speed is (0.7GHz) 18% lower
CPU Turbo Clock 3.7 GHz vs 4.9 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1.2GHz) 24% lower
Thermal Design Power 140 Watts vs 125 Watts Power consumption is (15Watts) 11% higher
2nd Choice
4.7/10 Score 3480
Intel i5-11600KF 6-core 3.9 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-11600KF 6-core 3.9 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i3-7101E Intel i3-7101E
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i5-10400T Intel i5-10400T
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i3-4360 Intel i3-4360
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i7-7700K Intel i7-7700K
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i5-3550 Intel i5-3550
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i7-11700 Intel i7-11700
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i9-11900K Intel i9-11900K
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i7-11700 Intel i7-11700
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i9-11900K Intel i9-11900K
vs