Search
Compare

Intel i5-11600KF 6-core 3.9 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor Intel i3-4160 2-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1150 54W Desktop Processor

4.7/10 Score 3480
Intel i5-11600KF 6-core 3.9 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
1.9/10 Score 1409
Intel i3-4160 2-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1150 54W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
$ 110
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

22 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

2

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

12

4

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
8% higher

3.9 GHz

3.6 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
27% higher

4.9 GHz

3.6 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

12 MB

3 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

Yes

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

No

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
49% faster

50 GB/s

25.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

32 GB

Generation

11

4

Socket

1200

1150

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

125 Watts

57% lower

54 Watts

Recommended
4.7/10 Score 3480
Intel i5-11600KF 6-core 3.9 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-11600KF 6-core 3.9 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 8
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% bigger
Cores 6 vs 2 (4) 67% more physical cores
Threads 12 vs 4 (8) 67% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Clock speed is (0.3GHz) 8% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 4.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1.3GHz) 27% higher
Cache 12 MB vs 3 MB (9MB) 75% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 50 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (24.4GB/s) 49% faster
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 32 GB Maximium memory is (96GB) 75% more
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 125 Watts vs 54 Watts Power consumption is (71Watts) 57% higher
2nd Choice
1.9/10 Score 1409
Intel i3-4160 2-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1150 54W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i3-4160 2-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1150 54W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
Intel i9-11900K Intel i9-11900K
vs
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
AMD Ryzen 1900X AMD Ryzen 1900X
vs
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
Intel i5-3570 Intel i5-3570
vs
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
Intel i3-7320 Intel i3-7320
vs
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
Intel i3-10300 Intel i3-10300
vs
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
Intel i3-6320 Intel i3-6320
vs
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE
vs
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
Intel i3-3210 Intel i3-3210
vs
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
Intel i3-8100 Intel i3-8100
vs
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
AMD Ryzen 3970X AMD Ryzen 3970X
vs