Search
Compare

Intel i5-11600KF 6-core 3.9 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor AMD Ryzen 5 1500X 4-core 3.5 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor

4.7/10 Score 3480
Intel i5-11600KF 6-core 3.9 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
3.4/10 Score 2477
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X 4-core 3.5 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
$ 150
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

4

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

12

8

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
10% higher

3.9 GHz

3.5 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
24% higher

4.9 GHz

3.7 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

12 MB

16 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
20% faster

50 GB/s

40 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

64 GB

Generation

11

0

Socket

1200

0

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

125 Watts

48% lower

65 Watts

Recommended
4.7/10 Score 3480
Intel i5-11600KF 6-core 3.9 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-11600KF 6-core 3.9 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 6
Cores 6 vs 4 (2) 33% more physical cores
Threads 12 vs 8 (4) 33% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.9 GHz vs 3.5 GHz Clock speed is (0.4GHz) 10% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 4.9 GHz vs 3.7 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1.2GHz) 24% higher
Memory Bandwidth 50 GB/s vs 40 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (10GB/s) 20% faster
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% more
CONS 2
Cache 12 MB vs 16 MB (4MB) 25% smaller processor cache memory
Thermal Design Power 125 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (60Watts) 48% higher
2nd Choice
3.4/10 Score 2477
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X 4-core 3.5 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X 4-core 3.5 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
Intel i7-6950X Intel i7-6950X
vs
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
Intel i3-8350K Intel i3-8350K
vs
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
Intel i5-9600KF Intel i5-9600KF
vs
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
Intel i5-9600K Intel i5-9600K
vs
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
Intel i7-6700 Intel i7-6700
vs
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
Intel i7-11700 Intel i7-11700
vs
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
Intel i3-6100T Intel i3-6100T
vs
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
Intel i7-8700T Intel i7-8700T
vs
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
Intel i5-8400 Intel i5-8400
vs
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
Intel i5-3330S Intel i5-3330S
vs