Search
Compare

Intel i5-11600 6-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor Intel i9-9900K 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor

4.7/10 Score 3477
Intel i5-11600 6-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
4.8/10 Score 3531
Intel i9-9900K 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
$ 544
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

12

16

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

2.8 GHz

22% higher

3.6 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

4.8 GHz

4% higher

5 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

12 MB

16 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
17% faster

50 GB/s

41.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

11

9

Socket

1200

1151

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
32% lower

65 Watts

95 Watts

Recommended
4.8/10 Score 3531
Intel i9-9900K 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-9900K 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 5
Cores 8 vs 6 (2) 25% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 12 (4) 25% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz Clock speed is (0.8GHz) 22% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5 GHz vs 4.8 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.2GHz) 4% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 12 MB (4MB) 25% bigger processor cache memory
CONS 2
Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s vs 50 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (8.4GB/s) 17% slower
Thermal Design Power 95 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (30Watts) 32% higher
2nd Choice
4.7/10 Score 3477
Intel i5-11600 6-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-11600 6-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
Intel i7-9700F Intel i7-9700F
vs
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
vs
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
Intel i9-8950HK Intel i9-8950HK
vs
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
Intel i7-8086K Intel i7-8086K
vs
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
Intel i5-8600K Intel i5-8600K
vs
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
Intel i9-9900T Intel i9-9900T
vs
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
Intel i3-6300T Intel i3-6300T
vs
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
Intel i5-8600T Intel i5-8600T
vs
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
Intel i5-4440S Intel i5-4440S
vs
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
Intel i7-5775C Intel i7-5775C
vs