Search
Compare

Intel i5-11600 6-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor Intel i9-10900K 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor

4.7/10 Score 3477
Intel i5-11600 6-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
5.1/10 Score 3720
Intel i9-10900K 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
$ 760
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

10

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

12

20

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

2.8 GHz

24% higher

3.7 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

4.8 GHz

9% higher

5.3 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

12 MB

20 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
8% faster

50 GB/s

45.8 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

11

10

Socket

1200

1200

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
48% lower

65 Watts

125 Watts

Recommended
5.1/10 Score 3720
Intel i9-10900K 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-10900K 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 5
Cores 10 vs 6 (4) 40% more physical cores
Threads 20 vs 12 (8) 40% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.7 GHz vs 2.8 GHz Clock speed is (0.9GHz) 24% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5.3 GHz vs 4.8 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.5GHz) 9% higher
Cache 20 MB vs 12 MB (8MB) 40% bigger processor cache memory
CONS 2
Memory Bandwidth 45.8 GB/s vs 50 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (4.2GB/s) 8% slower
Thermal Design Power 125 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (60Watts) 48% higher
2nd Choice
4.7/10 Score 3477
Intel i5-11600 6-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-11600 6-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i5-4440 Intel i5-4440
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i5-4570T Intel i5-4570T
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i7-8700T Intel i7-8700T
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i5-9600K Intel i5-9600K
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i5-7500T Intel i5-7500T
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i3-7300 Intel i3-7300
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i3-3220 Intel i3-3220
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i3-10100T Intel i3-10100T
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i3-9350KF Intel i3-9350KF
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i5-4690S Intel i5-4690S
vs