Search
Compare

Intel i5-11600 6-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor

4.7/10 Score 3477
Intel i5-11600 6-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
$ 440
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

22 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

12

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

2.8 GHz

15% higher

3.3 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
25% higher

4.8 GHz

3.6 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

12 MB

15 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

50 GB/s

26% faster

68 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

64 GB

Generation

11

5

Socket

1200

2011

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
54% lower

65 Watts

140 Watts

Recommended
4.7/10 Score 3477
Intel i5-11600 6-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-11600 6-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 4
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% bigger
CPU Turbo Clock 4.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1.2GHz) 25% higher
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% more
Thermal Design Power 65 Watts vs 140 Watts Power consumption is (75Watts) 54% lower
CONS 3
CPU Clock 2.8 GHz vs 3.3 GHz Clock speed is (0.5GHz) 15% lower
Cache 12 MB vs 15 MB (3MB) 20% smaller processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 50 GB/s vs 68 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (18GB/s) 26% slower
2nd Choice
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i5-11600 Intel i5-11600
Intel i5-9400T Intel i5-9400T
vs
Intel i5-11600 Intel i5-11600
Intel i9-11900 Intel i9-11900
vs
Intel i5-11600 Intel i5-11600
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 AMD Ryzen 7 1700
vs
Intel i5-11600 Intel i5-11600
Intel i3-9350K Intel i3-9350K
vs
Intel i5-11600 Intel i5-11600
Intel i7-8086K Intel i7-8086K
vs
Intel i5-11600 Intel i5-11600
Intel i5-10600K Intel i5-10600K
vs
Intel i5-11600 Intel i5-11600
Intel i9-11900T Intel i9-11900T
vs
Intel i5-11600 Intel i5-11600
Intel i7-9700K Intel i7-9700K
vs
Intel i5-11600 Intel i5-11600
AMD Ryzen 3970X AMD Ryzen 3970X
vs
Intel i5-11600 Intel i5-11600
Intel i5-10600K Intel i5-10600K
vs