Search
Compare

Intel i5-10600K 6-core 4.1 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor Intel i3-10320 4-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor

4.6/10 Score 3374
Intel i5-10600K 6-core 4.1 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
4.5/10 Score 3264
Intel i3-10320 4-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 290
$ 190
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

4

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

12

8

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
7% higher

4.1 GHz

3.8 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
4% higher

4.8 GHz

4.6 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

12 MB

8 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

41.6 GB/s

41.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

10

10

Socket

1200

1200

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

125 Watts

48% lower

65 Watts

Recommended
4.6/10 Score 3374
Intel i5-10600K 6-core 4.1 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-10600K 6-core 4.1 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 5
Cores 6 vs 4 (2) 33% more physical cores
Threads 12 vs 8 (4) 33% more logical cores
CPU Clock 4.1 GHz vs 3.8 GHz Clock speed is (0.3GHz) 7% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 4.8 GHz vs 4.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.2GHz) 4% higher
Cache 12 MB vs 8 MB (4MB) 33% bigger processor cache memory
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 125 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (60Watts) 48% higher
2nd Choice
4.5/10 Score 3264
Intel i3-10320 4-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i3-10320 4-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i5-10600K Intel i5-10600K
Intel i7-7700 Intel i7-7700
vs
Intel i5-10600K Intel i5-10600K
Intel i7-11700 Intel i7-11700
vs
Intel i5-10600K Intel i5-10600K
Intel i5-5675C Intel i5-5675C
vs
Intel i5-10600K Intel i5-10600K
Intel i3-3220T Intel i3-3220T
vs
Intel i5-10600K Intel i5-10600K
Intel i7-6800K Intel i7-6800K
vs
Intel i5-10600K Intel i5-10600K
Intel i5-5675C Intel i5-5675C
vs
Intel i5-10600K Intel i5-10600K
Intel i3-7300T Intel i3-7300T
vs
Intel i5-10600K Intel i5-10600K
Intel i3-8300 Intel i3-8300
vs
Intel i5-10600K Intel i5-10600K
Intel i3-8350K Intel i3-8350K
vs
Intel i5-10600K Intel i5-10600K
AMD Ryzen 1950X AMD Ryzen 1950X
vs