Search
Compare

Intel i5-10600 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor

4.6/10 Score 3391
Intel i5-10600 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 260
$ 440
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

22 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

12

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.3 GHz

3.3 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
25% higher

4.8 GHz

3.6 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

12 MB

15 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

41.6 GB/s

39% faster

68 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

64 GB

Generation

10

5

Socket

1200

2011

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
54% lower

65 Watts

140 Watts

Recommended
4.6/10 Score 3391
Intel i5-10600 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-10600 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 4
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% bigger
CPU Turbo Clock 4.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1.2GHz) 25% higher
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% more
Thermal Design Power 65 Watts vs 140 Watts Power consumption is (75Watts) 54% lower
CONS 2
Cache 12 MB vs 15 MB (3MB) 20% smaller processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s vs 68 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (26.4GB/s) 39% slower
2nd Choice
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i5-10600 Intel i5-10600
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 AMD Ryzen 7 1700
vs
Intel i5-10600 Intel i5-10600
Intel i7-4770S Intel i7-4770S
vs
Intel i5-10600 Intel i5-10600
Intel i9-11900 Intel i9-11900
vs
Intel i5-10600 Intel i5-10600
Intel i7-4790K Intel i7-4790K
vs
Intel i5-10600 Intel i5-10600
AMD Ryzen 1920X AMD Ryzen 1920X
vs
Intel i5-10600 Intel i5-10600
Intel i5-3570K Intel i5-3570K
vs
Intel i5-10600 Intel i5-10600
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
vs
Intel i5-10600 Intel i5-10600
Intel i3-4350 Intel i3-4350
vs
Intel i5-10600 Intel i5-10600
Intel i5-4690 Intel i5-4690
vs
Intel i5-10600 Intel i5-10600
Intel i5-6500T Intel i5-6500T
vs