Search
Compare

Intel i3-6100T 2-core 3.2 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor

2.8/10 Score 2024
Intel i3-6100T 2-core 3.2 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
4.8/10 Score 3521
Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 120
$ 544
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

2

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

4

16

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.2 GHz

20% higher

4 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

0 GHz

100% higher

5 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

3 MB

16 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

34.1 GB/s

18% faster

41.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

64 GB

128 GB

Generation

6

9

Socket

1151

1151

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
72% lower

35 Watts

127 Watts

Recommended
4.8/10 Score 3521
Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 7
Cores 8 vs 2 (6) 75% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 4 (12) 75% more logical cores
CPU Clock 4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz Clock speed is (0.8GHz) 20% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5 GHz vs 0 GHz Turbo clock speed is (5GHz) 100% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 3 MB (13MB) 81% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s vs 34.1 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (7.5GB/s) 18% faster
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% more
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 127 Watts vs 35 Watts Power consumption is (92Watts) 72% higher
2nd Choice
2.8/10 Score 2024
Intel i3-6100T 2-core 3.2 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i3-6100T 2-core 3.2 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i7-11700T Intel i7-11700T
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i3-9350KF Intel i3-9350KF
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
AMD Ryzen 3960X AMD Ryzen 3960X
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i5-10600T Intel i5-10600T
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i3-4160 Intel i3-4160
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i9-10920X Intel i9-10920X
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i5-7600 Intel i5-7600
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i5-5675C Intel i5-5675C
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i5-8600K Intel i5-8600K
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i3-8350K Intel i3-8350K
vs