Search
Compare

Intel i3-4330 2-core 3.5 GHz Socket 1150 54W Desktop Processor Intel i9-11900K 8-core 3.5 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor

1.9/10 Score 1427
Intel i3-4330 2-core 3.5 GHz Socket 1150 54W Desktop Processor
4.9/10 Score 3617
Intel i9-11900K 8-core 3.5 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 90
N\A
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

22 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

2

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

4

16

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.5 GHz

3.5 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

3.9 GHz

26% higher

5.3 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

4 MB

16 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

No

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

25.6 GB/s

49% faster

50 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

32 GB

128 GB

Generation

4

11

Socket

1150

1200

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
57% lower

54 Watts

125 Watts

Recommended
4.9/10 Score 3617
Intel i9-11900K 8-core 3.5 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-11900K 8-core 3.5 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 7
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% bigger
Cores 8 vs 2 (6) 75% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 4 (12) 75% more logical cores
CPU Turbo Clock 5.3 GHz vs 3.9 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1.4GHz) 26% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 4 MB (12MB) 75% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 50 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (24.4GB/s) 49% faster
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 32 GB Maximium memory is (96GB) 75% more
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 125 Watts vs 54 Watts Power consumption is (71Watts) 57% higher
2nd Choice
1.9/10 Score 1427
Intel i3-4330 2-core 3.5 GHz Socket 1150 54W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i3-4330 2-core 3.5 GHz Socket 1150 54W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-11900K Intel i9-11900K
Intel i5-7400 Intel i5-7400
vs
Intel i9-11900K Intel i9-11900K
Intel i9-11900 Intel i9-11900
vs
Intel i9-11900K Intel i9-11900K
Intel i5-8400 Intel i5-8400
vs
Intel i9-11900K Intel i9-11900K
Intel i5-6402P Intel i5-6402P
vs
Intel i9-11900K Intel i9-11900K
Intel i3-4130 Intel i3-4130
vs
Intel i9-11900K Intel i9-11900K
Intel i5-9500F Intel i5-9500F
vs
Intel i9-11900K Intel i9-11900K
Intel i5-4670S Intel i5-4670S
vs
Intel i9-11900K Intel i9-11900K
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
vs
Intel i9-11900K Intel i9-11900K
Intel i3-7300T Intel i3-7300T
vs
Intel i9-11900K Intel i9-11900K
Intel i5-11600K Intel i5-11600K
vs