Search
Compare

Intel i3-10300T 4-core 3 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor

4.4/10 Score 3233
Intel i3-10300T 4-core 3 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 140
$ 440
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

22 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

4

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

8

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3 GHz

9% higher

3.3 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
8% higher

3.9 GHz

3.6 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

8 MB

15 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

41.6 GB/s

39% faster

68 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

64 GB

Generation

10

5

Socket

1200

2011

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
75% lower

35 Watts

140 Watts

Recommended
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 5
Cores 6 vs 4 (2) 33% more physical cores
Threads 12 vs 8 (4) 33% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.3 GHz vs 3 GHz Clock speed is (0.3GHz) 9% higher
Cache 15 MB vs 8 MB (7MB) 47% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 68 GB/s vs 41.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (26.4GB/s) 39% faster
CONS 4
CPU Architecture 22 nm vs 14 nm CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% smaller
CPU Turbo Clock 3.6 GHz vs 3.9 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.3GHz) 8% lower
Maximum Memory 64 GB vs 128 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% less
Thermal Design Power 140 Watts vs 35 Watts Power consumption is (105Watts) 75% higher
2nd Choice
4.4/10 Score 3233
Intel i3-10300T 4-core 3 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i3-10300T 4-core 3 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i7-6950X Intel i7-6950X
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i3-4360 Intel i3-4360
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i5-9400T Intel i5-9400T
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 AMD Ryzen 7 1700
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i5-3450 Intel i5-3450
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i5-4590S Intel i5-4590S
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i3-9100T Intel i3-9100T
vs