Search
Compare

Intel i3-10100 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor

4.4/10 Score 3213
Intel i3-10100 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
4.8/10 Score 3521
Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 110
$ 544
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

4

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

8

16

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.6 GHz

10% higher

4 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

4.3 GHz

14% higher

5 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

6 MB

16 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

41.6 GB/s

41.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

10

9

Socket

1200

1151

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
49% lower

65 Watts

127 Watts

Recommended
4.8/10 Score 3521
Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 5
Cores 8 vs 4 (4) 50% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 8 (8) 50% more logical cores
CPU Clock 4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Clock speed is (0.4GHz) 10% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.7GHz) 14% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 6 MB (10MB) 63% bigger processor cache memory
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 127 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (62Watts) 49% higher
2nd Choice
4.4/10 Score 3213
Intel i3-10100 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i3-10100 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i3-4130 Intel i3-4130
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i5-4440S Intel i5-4440S
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i7-4790K Intel i7-4790K
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i5-8400 Intel i5-8400
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i5-7400T Intel i5-7400T
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i3-3210 Intel i3-3210
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i5-4460 Intel i5-4460
vs