Search
Compare

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-core 3.5 GHz Socket 0 105W Desktop Processor Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor

6.4/10 Score 4708
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-core 3.5 GHz Socket 0 105W Desktop Processor
5.1/10 Score 3728
Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 738
$ 460
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

7 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

16

10

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

32

20

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
20% higher

3.5 GHz

2.8 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

4.7 GHz

10% higher

5.2 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

64 MB

20 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
4% faster

47.6 GB/s

45.8 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

0

10

Socket

0

1200

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

105 Watts

38% lower

65 Watts

Recommended
6.4/10 Score 4708
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-core 3.5 GHz Socket 0 105W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-core 3.5 GHz Socket 0 105W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 6
CPU Architecture 7 nm vs 14 nm CPU architecture size is (7nm) 50% bigger
Cores 16 vs 10 (6) 38% more physical cores
Threads 32 vs 20 (12) 38% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz Clock speed is (0.7GHz) 20% higher
Cache 64 MB vs 20 MB (44MB) 69% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 47.6 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (1.8GB/s) 4% faster
CONS 2
CPU Turbo Clock 4.7 GHz vs 5.2 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.5GHz) 10% lower
Thermal Design Power 105 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (40Watts) 38% higher
2nd Choice
5.1/10 Score 3728
Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Intel i5-9500F Intel i5-9500F
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Intel i5-3340 Intel i5-3340
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Intel i5-6600T Intel i5-6600T
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Intel i9-11900T Intel i9-11900T
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Intel i3-4330T Intel i3-4330T
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Intel i3-8300 Intel i3-8300
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Intel i3-10320 Intel i3-10320
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Intel i3-3240 Intel i3-3240
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Intel i3-7320 Intel i3-7320
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Intel i5-4690T Intel i5-4690T
vs