Search
Compare

AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-core 3.8 GHz Socket 0 105W Desktop Processor Intel i9-10900T 10-core 1.9 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor

6.2/10 Score 4554
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-core 3.8 GHz Socket 0 105W Desktop Processor
5/10 Score 3694
Intel i9-10900T 10-core 1.9 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 449
N\A
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

7 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

12

10

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

24

20

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
50% higher

3.8 GHz

1.9 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

4.6 GHz

4.6 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

64 MB

20 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
4% faster

47.6 GB/s

45.8 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

0

10

Socket

0

1200

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

105 Watts

67% lower

35 Watts

Recommended
6.2/10 Score 4554
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-core 3.8 GHz Socket 0 105W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-core 3.8 GHz Socket 0 105W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 6
CPU Architecture 7 nm vs 14 nm CPU architecture size is (7nm) 50% bigger
Cores 12 vs 10 (2) 17% more physical cores
Threads 24 vs 20 (4) 17% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.8 GHz vs 1.9 GHz Clock speed is (1.9GHz) 50% higher
Cache 64 MB vs 20 MB (44MB) 69% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 47.6 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (1.8GB/s) 4% faster
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 105 Watts vs 35 Watts Power consumption is (70Watts) 67% higher
2nd Choice
5/10 Score 3694
Intel i9-10900T 10-core 1.9 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-10900T 10-core 1.9 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
AMD Ryzen 3960X AMD Ryzen 3960X
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i3-10100 Intel i3-10100
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i5-11600T Intel i5-11600T
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i5-4690K Intel i5-4690K
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i3-3245 Intel i3-3245
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i5-3330 Intel i5-3330
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i3-9300 Intel i3-9300
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i7-10700 Intel i7-10700
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i5-11400 Intel i5-11400
vs