Search
Compare

AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-core 3.8 GHz Socket 0 105W Desktop Processor Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor

6.2/10 Score 4554
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-core 3.8 GHz Socket 0 105W Desktop Processor
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 449
$ 440
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

7 nm

22 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

12

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

24

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
13% higher

3.8 GHz

3.3 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
22% higher

4.6 GHz

3.6 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

64 MB

15 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

47.6 GB/s

30% faster

68 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

64 GB

Generation

0

5

Socket

0

2011

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
25% lower

105 Watts

140 Watts

Recommended
6.2/10 Score 4554
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-core 3.8 GHz Socket 0 105W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-core 3.8 GHz Socket 0 105W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 8
CPU Architecture 7 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (15nm) 68% bigger
Cores 12 vs 6 (6) 50% more physical cores
Threads 24 vs 12 (12) 50% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.8 GHz vs 3.3 GHz Clock speed is (0.5GHz) 13% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 4.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1GHz) 22% higher
Cache 64 MB vs 15 MB (49MB) 77% bigger processor cache memory
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% more
Thermal Design Power 105 Watts vs 140 Watts Power consumption is (35Watts) 25% lower
CONS 1
Memory Bandwidth 47.6 GB/s vs 68 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (20.4GB/s) 30% slower
2nd Choice
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i3-9350KF Intel i3-9350KF
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i5-3570 Intel i5-3570
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
AMD Ryzen 2970WX AMD Ryzen 2970WX
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i7-8700 Intel i7-8700
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i5-8400 Intel i5-8400
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i3-7350K Intel i3-7350K
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i5-4690T Intel i5-4690T
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i5-4590T Intel i5-4590T
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i5-7500T Intel i5-7500T
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i5-6500T Intel i5-6500T
vs