Search
Compare

AMD Ryzen 7 3800X 8-core 3.9 GHz Socket 0 105W Desktop Processor Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor

5.3/10 Score 3868
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X 8-core 3.9 GHz Socket 0 105W Desktop Processor
5.2/10 Score 3813
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 339
$ 1000
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

7 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

16

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
18% higher

3.9 GHz

3.2 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
18% higher

4.5 GHz

3.7 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

32 MB

20 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

47.6 GB/s

38% faster

76.8 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

0

6

Socket

0

2011

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
25% lower

105 Watts

140 Watts

Recommended
5.3/10 Score 3868
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X 8-core 3.9 GHz Socket 0 105W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X 8-core 3.9 GHz Socket 0 105W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 5
CPU Architecture 7 nm vs 14 nm CPU architecture size is (7nm) 50% bigger
CPU Clock 3.9 GHz vs 3.2 GHz Clock speed is (0.7GHz) 18% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 4.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.8GHz) 18% higher
Cache 32 MB vs 20 MB (12MB) 38% bigger processor cache memory
Thermal Design Power 105 Watts vs 140 Watts Power consumption is (35Watts) 25% lower
CONS 1
Memory Bandwidth 47.6 GB/s vs 76.8 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (29.2GB/s) 38% slower
2nd Choice
5.2/10 Score 3813
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
AMD Ryzen 1920X AMD Ryzen 1920X
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Intel i3-4350 Intel i3-4350
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Intel i3-6100 Intel i3-6100
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Intel i3-6300T Intel i3-6300T
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Intel i3-4350 Intel i3-4350
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Intel i5-11600K Intel i5-11600K
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X AMD Ryzen 5 1500X
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Intel i3-4330T Intel i3-4330T
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Intel i3-3250 Intel i3-3250
vs