Search
Compare

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor Intel i9-10900T 10-core 1.9 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor

5.3/10 Score 3889
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
5/10 Score 3694
Intel i9-10900T 10-core 1.9 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 299
N\A
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

7 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

10

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

20

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
47% higher

3.6 GHz

1.9 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

4.4 GHz

4% higher

4.6 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

32 MB

20 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
4% faster

47.6 GB/s

45.8 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

0

10

Socket

0

1200

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

65 Watts

46% lower

35 Watts

Recommended
5/10 Score 3694
Intel i9-10900T 10-core 1.9 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-10900T 10-core 1.9 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 4
Cores 10 vs 8 (2) 20% more physical cores
Threads 20 vs 16 (4) 20% more logical cores
CPU Turbo Clock 4.6 GHz vs 4.4 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.2GHz) 4% higher
Thermal Design Power 35 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (30Watts) 46% lower
CONS 4
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 7 nm CPU architecture size is (7nm) 50% smaller
CPU Clock 1.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Clock speed is (1.7GHz) 47% lower
Cache 20 MB vs 32 MB (12MB) 38% smaller processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 45.8 GB/s vs 47.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (1.8GB/s) 4% slower
2nd Choice
5.3/10 Score 3889
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i3-4360 Intel i3-4360
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i3-9300T Intel i3-9300T
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
AMD Ryzen 3970X AMD Ryzen 3970X
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i7-9700T Intel i7-9700T
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i5-8400T Intel i5-8400T
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i7-9700 Intel i7-9700
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
AMD Ryzen 1920X AMD Ryzen 1920X
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i5-8500 Intel i5-8500
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i7-4790 Intel i7-4790
vs