Search
Compare

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor Intel i9-10900K 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor

5.3/10 Score 3889
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
5.1/10 Score 3720
Intel i9-10900K 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 299
$ 760
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

7 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

10

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

20

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.6 GHz

3% higher

3.7 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

4.4 GHz

17% higher

5.3 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

32 MB

20 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
4% faster

47.6 GB/s

45.8 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

0

10

Socket

0

1200

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
48% lower

65 Watts

125 Watts

Recommended
5.1/10 Score 3720
Intel i9-10900K 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-10900K 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 4
Cores 10 vs 8 (2) 20% more physical cores
Threads 20 vs 16 (4) 20% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Clock speed is (0.1GHz) 3% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5.3 GHz vs 4.4 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.9GHz) 17% higher
CONS 4
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 7 nm CPU architecture size is (7nm) 50% smaller
Cache 20 MB vs 32 MB (12MB) 38% smaller processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 45.8 GB/s vs 47.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (1.8GB/s) 4% slower
Thermal Design Power 125 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (60Watts) 48% higher
2nd Choice
5.3/10 Score 3889
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i3-3250 Intel i3-3250
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i3-6100T Intel i3-6100T
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i5-9500F Intel i5-9500F
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i5-4460 Intel i5-4460
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i7-7700 Intel i7-7700
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i5-8600K Intel i5-8600K
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i5-9400T Intel i5-9400T
vs