Search
Compare

AMD Ryzen 7 2700E 8-core 2.8 GHz Socket 0 45W Desktop Processor Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor

3.7/10 Score 2684
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E 8-core 2.8 GHz Socket 0 45W Desktop Processor
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
$ 440
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

12 nm

22 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

2.8 GHz

15% higher

3.3 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
10% higher

4 GHz

3.6 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

16 MB

15 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

43.7 GB/s

36% faster

68 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

64 GB

64 GB

Generation

0

5

Socket

0

2011

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
68% lower

45 Watts

140 Watts

Recommended
3.7/10 Score 2684
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E 8-core 2.8 GHz Socket 0 45W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E 8-core 2.8 GHz Socket 0 45W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 6
CPU Architecture 12 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (10nm) 45% bigger
Cores 8 vs 6 (2) 25% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 12 (4) 25% more logical cores
CPU Turbo Clock 4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.4GHz) 10% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 15 MB (1MB) 6% bigger processor cache memory
Thermal Design Power 45 Watts vs 140 Watts Power consumption is (95Watts) 68% lower
CONS 2
CPU Clock 2.8 GHz vs 3.3 GHz Clock speed is (0.5GHz) 15% lower
Memory Bandwidth 43.7 GB/s vs 68 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (24.3GB/s) 36% slower
2nd Choice
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
Intel i7-4770T Intel i7-4770T
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
Intel i5-9600 Intel i5-9600
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
Intel i3-6300 Intel i3-6300
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
Intel i5-8500T Intel i5-8500T
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
Intel i5-11600K Intel i5-11600K
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
Intel i5-10600K Intel i5-10600K
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
Intel i5-9400 Intel i5-9400
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
Intel i5-3470S Intel i5-3470S
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
Intel i3-8300 Intel i3-8300
vs